Cihan University-Erbil Scientific Journal a periodic multidisciplinary scientific journal issued by Cihan University- Erbil after auditing and revising by a specialized staff headed by the President of the university. The journal publishes original creative researches related to all fields of pure and applied sciences and humanities in Kurdish, Arabic and English.
Related Articles
Author:Abbas Fadhil Lutfi
Cihan University-Erbil,Department of English, College of Arts & Letters
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24086/cuesj.si.2018.n1a4
Abstract
This study affords new insights into the meaning construction phenomenon and poetic language. It is a widely held view that the language of poetry and the naturally occurring language represent two different types of language, which employ different meaning construction devices and principles, and which have little in common. However, this work aims to verify that poetic language is but a mode of meaning construction, and its devices, which have long been said to be literary devices serving different rhetorical aims, are part of the general devices used in performing different mental activities, most importantly meaning production and consumption. As a way of cross-checking this hypothesis, romantic poetry was taken as the corpus of the study.
The paper represents an application of a major cognitive semantic theory, namely image schema, to three Romantic poems, namely Byron’s ‘The Prisoner of Chillon’, Keat’s ‘To Autumn’, and Shelley’s ‘Ode to the West Wind’.
Perhaps among the major conclusions of the study are the following: (1) It is not possible to establish a neat dividing line between literal and figurative meaning, or to enforce a clear division between the language of poetry and that of everyday use, especially with respect to meaning construction devices and techniques. (2) Romantic poetry exploits, for aesthetic purposes, cognitive processes, including linguistic, that were initially evolved for non-aesthetic purposes. The reading of poetry involves adapting cognitive processes for purposes for which they were not originally devised. (3) Romantic poetry uses few concrete nouns combined with abstract deictic references, which makes it virtually impossible for a reader to pinpoint the exact thing the poem describes. The information provided in the romantic poems is very lowly categorised and therefore violent to our ordinary cognitive processes of dealing with the world. (4) The majority of the rhetorical devices, specifically the meaning devices, are important meaning construction devices that involve different cognitive processes. Representative examples of such devices include ‘allegory’, ‘allusion’, ‘hyperbole’, ‘juxtaposition’, ‘personification’, ‘satire’, ‘simile’, etc.
Keywords: Functionalism, Semantics, Syntax, Objects in Arabic
References
Abdulla, A. K. (1989). History of literary criticism: An introductory reader. Mosul: Ministry of Higher Education Press.
Al-Hilali, M. T., & Khan, M. M. (1404 A.H.). Translation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur’an in the English Language. Madinah: King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an.
Anderson, G. K., Buckler, W. E., & Veeder, M. H. (1979). The literature of England (3rd ed.). Glenview: Foresman and Company.
Bloom, H. (1968). The ode to autumn. In J. Stillinger (Ed.), Keats’s odes (pp. 44-47). Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, reason, and imagination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ousby, I. (1996). Cambridge paperback guide to literature in English. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York, NY: Longman Group.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.
St Clair, W. (2005). The reading nation in the romantic period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Tsur, R. (2003) Deixis and abstractions: Adventures in space and time. In J. Gavins & G. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice (pp. 41-54). London: Routledge.
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Walter, E. (Ed.). (2008). Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary (3rd ed.). Cambridgr: Cambridge University Press.
Ward, A. W., Waller, A. R., Trent, W. P., Erskine, J., Sherman, S. P., & Doren, C. V. (Eds.). (2000). The Cambridge history of English and American literature (Vol. 7): The romantic revival. New York, NY: Bartleby.com. Retrieved from http://www.bartleby.com/cambridge.
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus,OH: Ohio State University Press.
Full Text
